Meikles Limited ( 2017 Abridged Report

first_imgMeikles Limited ( listed on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange under the Industrial holding sector has released it’s 2017 abridged results.For more information about Meikles Limited ( reports, abridged reports, interim earnings results and earnings presentations, visit the Meikles Limited ( company page on AfricanFinancials.Document: Meikles Limited (  2017 abridged results.Company ProfileMeikles Limited is an established 100-year old company in Zimbabwe primarily invested in the agriculture, hotels and retail sector. The company operates six business segments; hospitality, retail stores which include department stores, supermarkets and wholesalers, and agricultural, financial services and security. Its well-known brands include the Meikles Hotel, Victoria Falls Hotel, TM Supermarkets, Meikles Stores and Tanganda Tea which produces, packs and distributes Zimbabwe’s famous tea brand aswell as Tinga Mira, a bottled spring water brand. Tanganda Tea Company also owns estates that produce avocados and macadamia nuts. Meikles Limited has department stores in three major cities in Zimbabwe which includes Barbours department store in Harare; and has a national footprint with 50 retail stores in towns and cities throughout Zimbabwe. Meikles Limited recently expanded into the mining and guarding sector and owns Meikles Centar Mining and Meikles Guard Services (Private) Limited in Zimbabwe. Meikles Financial Services offers mobile financial solutions and bill payment services to the retail and commercial sector in Zimbabwe; under the brand name My Cash. Meikles Limited is listed on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchangelast_img read more

Camelot Ghana Limited ( Q32018 Interim Report

first_imgCamelot Ghana Limited ( listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange under the Paper & Packaging sector has released it’s 2018 interim results for the third quarter.For more information about Camelot Ghana Limited ( reports, abridged reports, interim earnings results and earnings presentations, visit the Camelot Ghana Limited ( company page on AfricanFinancials.Document: Camelot Ghana Limited (  2018 interim results for the third quarter.Company ProfileCamelot Ghana Limited is a security printing company involved in the design, processing, printing and finishing of security print orders, business forms and documents and identity products. The company provides a service to governmental departments, financial institutions and multi-national organisations. Security stationary issued by Camelot Ghana Limited ranges from cheque books and banker’s drafts to share certificates, dividend warrants and lottery tickets. The company produces continuous and cut sheet stationary for insurance company forms, optical character recognition (OCR) forms, pre-prints for laser printers, listing paper and airline boarding passes. Company printing solutions range from magstripe encoded cards to UV cured cards, access control cards and ID cards. Government printing solutions for range from council tax forms to utility billing cards, electoral ballot papers and revenue collection tickets. Subsidiaries of Camelot Ghana Limit offer services ranging from holograms, holosealing, embossed hotfoiling to watermarked cheque paper, chemically-sensitive security paper, solvent sensitive inks, tri-thermochromic inks and microtext printing. Camelot Ghana Limited services governments and institutions in Togo, Burkina Faso, Liberia, Benin, Côte d ´Ivoire, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone and Nigeria. The company headquarters are in Accra, Ghana. Camelot Ghana Limited is listed on the Ghana Stock Exchangelast_img read more

Central Florida Zoo honors military for Veterans Day with free admission

first_img Lesser Spot-Nosed Guenon Please enter your name here Please enter your comment! In honor of Veterans Day, the Central Florida Zoo & Botanical Gardens is offering FREE single-day admission to active and retired military members.The free admission offer will be available at the Zoo starting Saturday, November 7, 2020 through Veterans Day, Wednesday, November 11, 2020*.The offer is available to active and retired military including active duty and current guard/reserves as well as non-active duty, retirees and veterans. Military members must simply show a valid military I.D. or DD214 at the Zoo’s Admission window.And it doesn’t stop there. Immediate family members who wish to make some memories with their veteran will still receive 25 % off single-day Zoo admission.The complimentary admission and discount are only available when purchasing tickets in-person at the Zoo and cannot be applied to online purchases.*Tickets can only be purchased the day of visit at the Zoo’s Admission window. Proper ID is required.The Central Florida Zoo & Botanical Gardens is a 501 (c) 3 non-profit that is an affordable family experience supported by private donations and gate admission. They are one of a handful of private non-profit zoos in the country and a great community resource that enhances the quality of life in Central Florida by offering a unique Zoo experience. The Zoo brings the world of animals to guests who may never have the opportunity to see these animals in the wild, and they are dedicated to the preservation and conservation of animals worldwide. In their efforts to educate the children of Central Florida they offer premier educational experiences that reach over 100,000 school children each year through summer camps, programs and community outreaches.  The Anatomy of Fear You have entered an incorrect email address! Please enter your email address here TAGSActive DutyAdmissionCentral Florida Zoo & Botanical GardensFreeMilitaryReservesRetiredVeterans Day Previous articleHow to use COVID-19 testing and quarantining to safely travel for the holidaysNext articleDeath rates have fallen by 18% for hospitalized COVID–19 patients as treatments improve Denise Connell RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply From the Central Florida Zoo & Botanical Gardens Support conservation and fish with NEW Florida specialty license plate Free webinar for job seekers on best interview answers, hosted by Goodwill June 11 Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.last_img read more


first_img “COPY” Save this picture!© Miquel Coll Molas+ 26 Share 2012 Spain “COPY” Architects: BETA OFFICE ARCHITECTS Area Area of this architecture project Area:  511 m² Area:  511 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOr Clipboard Year:  ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOr Clipboard House in Rubí / BETA OFFICE ARCHITECTSSave this projectSaveHouse in Rubí / BETA OFFICE ARCHITECTS Projects CopyHouses•Rubi, Spain photographs:  Miquel Coll Molas Photographs:  Miquel Coll Molas Technical Architect:Jaime Serrano DíazStructural Engineer:Jaume Guardia TomásCollaborators:Jordi Segalés Perez, Ernest Sánchez ArcaronsArchitects In Charge:Raúl Bañón Tomás, Brian Ramón Aguilar, Xavi Freire CanoCity:RubiCountry:SpainMore SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!© Miquel Coll Molas Save this picture!© Miquel Coll MolasThe heavy and the light meet each other at the same language. Absence of colours but reflections multiplies. None of this is incompatible with the architecture that serves and shows without complex the efficiency and convenience for the user’s life. Save this picture!First Floor PlanA two-dimensional geometric twinning of the two main parts of the building, which without their gear, the third piece of services, that looks out the rear, and the relationship between them, it would be nothing more than a shallow contact.Save this picture!© Miquel Coll MolasThis is how could be geometrically summarized this detached dwelling projected by the team Beta Office Architects. This house has a surface of 287 sqm built in a rectangular plot of 511 sqm. It consists of a basement, ground and first floor. It is located in Rubí, a town near Barcelona. Save this picture!Ground Floor PlanThe house is projected for a 4 member family; the main requirement for the project was that the housing had to be accessible to handicapped people inside and outside the building, so we took all the necessary foresights, including the installation of a lift allowing the vertical mobility between all the different floors, including the basement, where there is the parking area; outside the building there are several ramps helping the family members to move towards all the garden. Save this picture!© Miquel Coll MolasThe functional program consists in the basement of a parking area, storage facilities, installations room and the lobby. On the ground floor there is the main access from the street, consisting of a stairwell and an elevator; there is also the toilet, kitchen with dining room, living room, laundry room and 2 single bedrooms for the children of the family with a shared bathroom. On the first floor it is located the double bedroom suite, with dressing room, storage for clothing, a study and a terrace. Outside the building, Beta Office architects proposed a swimming pool for the family, having the dimensions and the access to it according to the requirements present in the entire project. The pool is surrounded by gardened areas and a porch, directly communicated with the dining room and the kitchenProject gallerySee allShow lessCritical Round-Up: Tate Britain Renovation, Caruso St. JohnArchitecture News52 Social Housing in Tarragona / aguilera|guerrero architectsSelected Projects Share Year:  2012 Houses House in Rubí / BETA OFFICE ARCHITECTS CopyAbout this officeBETA OFFICE ARCHITECTS OfficeFollowProductConcrete#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesRubiHousesResidentialSpainPublished on November 27, 2013Cite: “House in Rubí / BETA OFFICE ARCHITECTS ” 27 Nov 2013. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Browse the CatalogPartitionsSkyfoldChoosing the Skyfold Wall for Your SpaceGlass3MGlass Finish – FASARA™ GeometricShower ColumnshansgroheShoulder ShowersPanels / Prefabricated AssembliesMorin Corp.Metal Wall Systems – ExposedStonesCosentinoSurfaces – Dekton® Stonika SeriesConcrete FloorsSikaIndustrial Floor CoatingsHanging LampsLouis PoulsenPendant Lights – KeglenDoorsSky-FrameInsulated Sliding Doors – Sky-Frame SlopeThermalSchöckMinimizing Thermal Bridges in BalconiesWindowspanoramah!®ah! Ultra MinimalistEnclosures / Double Skin FacadesAlucoilStructural Honeycomb Panels – LarcoreWork ChairsDynamobelWork Chair – SLAT 16More products »Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my stream Photographs ArchDailylast_img read more

House Lessans / McGonigle McGrath

first_imgPhotographs:  Aidan McGrath Manufacturers Brands with products used in this architecture project Save this picture!© Aidan McGrathText description provided by the architects. The site is located in the gently rolling landscape of County Down. An existing assembly of barn and shed with double yard were the remnants of a small farmstead, the original farmhouse now a neighbouring plot. Approached by an overgrown lane, the enclosure created by the buildings and low walls only became apparent when at the yards, the predominant view from the lane being of the drumlins beyond.Save this picture!© Aidan McGrathSave this picture!PlanSave this picture!© Aidan McGrathThe brief was for a simple dwelling to meet the accommodation needs of a semi-retired couple and their children, now only occasional visitors. The connection to place and to the language of the derelict but elegant barn one of a number of defined objectives. Planning permission already existed for a new dwelling on the site.Save this picture!© Aidan McGrathThe house is conceived as 2 simple elements arranged in relation to the retained and re-used barn, to create the enclosure associated with vernacular clusters, and to permit visual and physical connections to the rolling landscape to the south and west. The first element, containing only bedrooms, is positioned to create the sloping arrival yard, and an enclosed space to the rear. The second living element is rotated to address the view. The entrance is positioned between these elements and allows the visitor the experience of both enclosure and landscape.Save this picture!© Aidan McGrathForms and materiality are derived from the language of local corrugated agricultural outbuildings, simple pitched roofs of zinc on masonry walls creating courts and yards, referenced to the datum set by the barn, all rising from an embedded concrete plinth. Internally, generous volumes reflect the existing barn and track the external forms, and views to the landscape are carefully framed. Subtle shifts in level separate the functions.Construction methods were necessarily basic, and detailing is precise and restrained.Save this picture!© Aidan McGrathProject gallerySee allShow lessShiye Art Space / M.A.O.Selected ProjectsArchitecture For Exhibition: Lectures And Internships With International Architectur…Lecture Series Share ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOr Clipboard House Lessans / McGonigle McGrath Manufacturers: D-Line, The Rooflight Company, VMZINC Products translation missing: ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOr Clipboard “COPY” Year:  “COPY” United Kingdom CopyHouses•Saintfield, United Kingdom Area:  230 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project House Lessans / McGonigle McGrathSave this projectSaveHouse Lessans / McGonigle McGrath Architects: McGonigle McGrath Area Area of this architecture project Photographs Houses Projects 2019 Save this picture!© Aidan McGrath+ 25Curated by Paula Pintos Share ArchDaily CopyAbout this officeMcGonigle McGrathOfficeFollowProductsSteelBrick#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesSaintfieldUnited KingdomPublished on June 10, 2019Cite: “House Lessans / McGonigle McGrath” 10 Jun 2019. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Browse the CatalogFaucets / SinkshansgroheKitchen SinksGlass3MSun Control Window Film in MarkthalPartitionsSkyfoldIntegrating Operable Walls in a SpaceRetractable StructuresShadeFXRetractable Canopies in Beverly HillsPanels / Prefabricated AssembliesIsland Exterior FabricatorsSpecialty Facade SystemsWoodSculptformTimber Tongue and Groove CladdingSkylightsVELUX CommercialLonglight 5-30° – Modular SkylightsBars / Wire / MeshJakobWebnet – Sports NetSuspension SystemsMetawellAluminum Panels for Ceiling SailsMineral / Organic PaintsKEIMTiO2-free Mineral Paint – Soldalit®-ArteHanging LampsLuminisPendant Lights – HollowcoreHandicap BathroomAamsco Lighting, Inc.Mirror-Lux LED Illuminated MirrorMore products »Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my streamlast_img read more

Transformation of An Old Tiny Farmcottage Into a Rural House /…

first_imgArchDaily Photographs:  Guillermo Avanzini AlcibarFounding Partners:Adrián Martínez Muñoz, Guillermo Avanzini AlcibarConstruction:Enrique UyarraCarpentry:Victor M. SánchezPromoter / Owner:Rocío Avanzini, Germán BarbierCity:OjacastroCountry:SpainMore SpecsLess SpecsSave this picture!© Guillermo Avanzini AlcibarRecommended ProductsResidential ApplicationsLunawoodLunawood Thermowood Façade and Decking in Project ÖMetallicsStudcoWall Stop Ends – EzyCapWoodBruagBalcony BalustradesEnclosures / Double Skin FacadesIsland Exterior FabricatorsCurtain Wall Facade SystemsText description provided by the architects. A tiny farm cottage is ment to be come into an occasional appartment through a complete rehabilitation. In this small intervention crystallizes an attitude that seeks to identify rural morphologies and join them at the rate of development of this environment. Urban planning instruments can often endanger these morphologies, leading to the destruction of sometimes secular constructions by increasing building rights.Save this picture!© Guillermo Avanzini AlcibarSave this picture!PlanSave this picture!© Guillermo Avanzini AlcibarSuch is the case of this plot, intended to locate a three-story building that has nothing to do with the scale of the urban fabric of the town of Ojacastro. The owners’ sensitive criteria, together with the willingness of the City Council to allow the intervention, have managed to stop the degradation of this corner of the town avoiding the loss of heritage that would have ment the execution of the urban planning.Save this picture!© Guillermo Avanzini AlcibarThe inside is conceived as an habitable piece of furniture: a light balloon-frame house is built, filling the space between the massive stone walls. Reduced surface requires the entire house program to be developed in a single space. Foldable furniture, a wall bed, a kitchen hiding wardrobe, storage, home appliances… All of them hidden in the thick walls, but ready to be used when ever needed. Living room is easily transformed into the dining room and then again into the bedroom.Save this picture!© Guillermo Avanzini AlcibarSave this picture!SectionSave this picture!© Guillermo Avanzini AlcibarRegarding the construction, the stone walls are kept and strengthened, so are roof tiles. Seriously harmed wooden framework of the roof is replaced by a similar fishbone-shaped ceiling made out of laminated timber beams.Save this picture!© Guillermo Avanzini AlcibarProject gallerySee allShow lessHouse 34 / dIONISO LABSelected ProjectsPERI Canteen / Studio ESW + Mühlich, Fink & PartnerSelected Projects Share Houses Transformation of An Old Tiny Farmcottage Into a Rural House / MAAV “COPY” Architects: MAAV Area Area of this architecture project Spain Year:  ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOr Clipboard ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOr Clipboard “COPY” Area:  431 ft² Year Completion year of this architecture project Transformation of An Old Tiny Farmcottage Into a Rural House / MAAVSave this projectSaveTransformation of An Old Tiny Farmcottage Into a Rural House / MAAV CopyHouses, Renovation•Ojacastro, Spain Projects Photographs 2020 Save this picture!© Guillermo Avanzini Alcibar+ 21Curated by Clara Ott Share CopyAbout this officeMAAVOfficeFollowProductsWoodStone#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesRefurbishmentRenovationOn FacebookSpainPublished on April 13, 2021Cite: “Transformation of An Old Tiny Farmcottage Into a Rural House / MAAV” [Transformación de antiguo almacén de aperos en vivienda rural / MAAV] 13 Apr 2021. ArchDaily. Accessed 10 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Browse the CatalogPanels / Prefabricated AssembliesTechnowoodGRP Siding Façade SystemGlassMitrexSolar GreenhouseMetal PanelsAurubisMill Finished Copper: Nordic StandardMetallicsHAVER & BOECKERArchitectural Wire Mesh – MULTI-BARRETTE 8130Enclosures / Double Skin FacadesIsland Exterior FabricatorsCurtain Wall Facade SystemsSealantsEffisusGutter Repair – TiteGutter3Aluminium CompositesSculptformAluminium Click-on BattensTiles / Mosaic / GresiteMargresPorcelain Tiles – Linea PrestigeMetallicsRHEINZINKZinc Roof Systems – Click Roll CapsTiles / Mosaic / GresiteTerrealTerracotta Cladding TileDoorsECLISSESliding Pocket Door – ECLISSE UnilateralWindowsJoskoWindows and Sliding Doors – ONE SeriesMore products »Save世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my streamlast_img read more

Garfield Weston Foundation launches new site to help funding applicants

first_imgGarfield Weston Foundation launches new site to help funding applicants  80 total views,  2 views today AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis17 AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis17 Melanie May | 25 April 2017 | News The Garfield Weston Foundation has launched its new website, which aims to help potential applicant charities with the process of applying for funding.The new Garfield Weston Foundation site is mobile-friendly, and features examples and guidelines on many of the aspects of applying for funding that charities find most challenging according to the Foundation’s feedback and experience, including presenting fundraising plans and charity finances.Guidance has also been provided on core costs in response to the Foundation’s previous research and experience, which has shown confusion in the voluntary sector over the scope and availability of core costs funding. New advice on the website aims to help by using clear guidelines and case studies.Philippa Charles, director of the Garfield Weston Foundation said,“The Trustees understand how challenging and resource-intensive fundraising can be in today’s voluntary sector. We aim to ensure that applying for funding is as straightforward as possible, and that charities receive the right advice in filling out their applications.“We have listened to feedback from our applicants and have strived to make our guidance on applying for grants online even clearer, as well as making sure our website is easy to navigate and completely accessible.“We hope the new guidance will be helpful to charities in applying not only to the Garfield Weston Foundation, but also to other potential sources of funding”.  79 total views,  1 views today Advertisement Tagged with: Funding About Melanie May Melanie May is a journalist and copywriter specialising in writing both for and about the charity and marketing services sectors since 2001. She can be reached via read more

Greenham Trust offers £250,000 COVID-19 emergency funding

first_imgOther trusts support the fundSince the Greenham Trust funding was put in place, Sovereign Housing Association has pledged £50,000 locally and £50,000 for the organisation’s wider area, Peter Baker Foundation has committed £25,000 and Berkshire-focused Englefield Charitable Trust £10,000.Chris Boulton, Chief Executive of Greenham Trust saidL “We are truly grateful for the generosity shown by Sovereign Housing Association, Peter Baker Foundation and Englefield Charitable Trust and we encourage everyone who can donate to our appeal, to do so via The Good Exchange. Any donation, no matter how small, is very much appreciated”.Michelle Smith, Head of Communities, Sovereign Housing Association, said that they chose to work with the Greenham Trust and Good Exchange because “investing in the existing structures that already hold us together and make us stronger makes perfect sense.”Berkshire collaborationGreenham Trust is supporting vulnerable and elderly people by working alongside many local Berkshire organisations including: Advertisement Tagged with: coronavirus COVID-19 Funding small charities About Howard Lake Howard Lake is a digital fundraising entrepreneur. Publisher of UK Fundraising, the world’s first web resource for professional fundraisers, since 1994. Trainer and consultant in digital fundraising. Founder of Fundraising Camp and co-founder of Researching massive growth in giving. AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis3 Howard Lake | 23 March 2020 | News Applying for a grantTo donate money or apply for a grant visit The Good Exchange.Greenham Trust Ltd was founded in 1997 to purchase the former Greenham Common Airbase, and to create and manage the new 150-acre Greenham Business Park. The Trust’s principal objective is to use income from commercial property to provide charitable funding for the benefit of the local communities in West Berkshire and North Hampshire. Greenham Trust offers £250,000 COVID-19 emergency funding Greenham Trust has put in place £250,000 of emergency funding which is available for local charities and voluntary organisations who are supporting the elderly and vulnerable people through the COVID-19 crisis in West Berkshire and north Hampshire.Greenham Trust has also launched a public appeal on its charitable funding platform, The Good Exchange, and pledged to match up to £100,000 of this funding for donations received via the platform. For every £1 raised, Greenham Trust will match £1 to support local charities who require additional help during the pandemic. The £100,000 fund will go to help those charities and volunteer organisations supporting those most urgently in need including:Helping elderly or vulnerable people or people with chronic underlying health conditions or diseases in self-isolation or quarantine who need access to food, medicines or social careProviding more support for food banksIncreasing the number of meals on wheels deliveries to support the elderlyProviding financial, employment and debt adviceGiving counselling, suicide prevention and mental health support for those who have for example lost their jobs, are grieving or are in crisisSupporting those who are homeless or in temporary accommodation West Berkshire CouncilNewbury Soup KitchenCitizens Advice West BerkshireAge Concern West BerkshireVolunteer Centre West BerkshireCommunity Furniture ProjectHealthwatch West Berkshire.  359 total views,  2 views today AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis3  358 total views,  1 views todaylast_img read more

Business community loses leading lights

first_imgVanishing Ireland podcast documenting interviews with people over 70’s, looking for volunteers to share their stories Limerick’s National Camogie League double header to be streamed live Twitter RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Linkedin Advertisement Limerick Ladies National Football League opener to be streamed live Predictions on the future of learning discussed at Limerick Lifelong Learning Festival TAGSbusinessfeaturedlimerick Limerick Artist ‘Willzee’ releases new Music Video – “A Dream of Peace” Print Facebook Email LIMERICK’s business community is mourning the loss this week of two of its leading lights, Nevil O’Sullivan of Nevil’s shoes and Gretta Fitzgerald of Greta Gibbs.Nevil O’Sullivan RIPA father of three, Nevil ran a successful shoe-sales business in O’Connell Street for many years. The Ballyclough man passed away on November 14 peacefully at Milford Care Centre after an illness.He is survived by his wife Chris, and children Méabh, Nevil and Jack as well as his brothers Gene and John, sister-in-law Helen, staff of Nevil’s Shoes, mother-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law. He was buried after Requiem Mass on Monday in Castlemungret Cemetery.Sign up for the weekly Limerick Post newsletter Sign Up Previous article#VIDEO Noonan evades protestors as new figures leakedNext article#VIDEO Plans to privatise AIB due before Christmas Bernie Englishhttp://www.limerickpost.ieBernie English has been working as a journalist in national and local media for more than thirty years. She worked as a staff journalist with the Irish Press and Evening Press before moving to Clare. She has worked as a freelance for all of the national newspaper titles and a staff journalist in Limerick, helping to launch the Limerick edition of The Evening Echo. Bernie was involved in the launch of The Clare People where she was responsible for business and industry news. BusinessNewsBusiness community loses leading lightsBy Bernie English – November 17, 2014 2919 Gretta Fitzgerald RIPMrs Fitzgerald was at the helm of Gretta Gibbs boutique in Catherine Street for almost thirty years. She died on November 15 following an accident in her home.Gretta is survived by her husband Sean, sons Ryan, Paul and Josh as well as sisters Veronica, Lillian and Ursula and brothers, Ollie and James.The house is private and funeral Mass will be at 11 am on Wednesday, November 19. WhatsApp WATCH: “Everyone is fighting so hard to get on” – Pat Ryan on competitive camogie squads last_img read more

[Domestic Violence Act] Wife Entitled To Claim Right Of Residence Which Belongs To Relatives Of Husband Also: SC Overrules Its 2006 ‘SR Batra’ Judgment [Read Judgment]

first_imgTop Stories[Domestic Violence Act] Wife Entitled To Claim Right Of Residence Which Belongs To Relatives Of Husband Also: SC Overrules Its 2006 ‘SR Batra’ Judgment [Read Judgment] Ashok Kini15 Oct 2020 4:47 AMShare This – xA wife is also entitled to claim a right to residence in a shared household belonging to relatives of the husband, the Supreme Court has held on Thursday in an important judgment overruling the 2006 judgment in S.R. Batra vs Taruna Batra.”In the event, shared household belongs to any relative of the husband with whom in a domestic relationship the woman has lived, the…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginA wife is also entitled to claim a right to residence in a shared household belonging to relatives of the husband, the Supreme Court has held on Thursday in an important judgment overruling the 2006 judgment in S.R. Batra vs Taruna Batra.”In the event, shared household belongs to any relative of the husband with whom in a domestic relationship the woman has  lived, the conditions mentioned in Section 2(s) are satisfied and the said house will become a shared household. “, the Court said.The bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah observed the definition of ‘shared household’ given in Section 2(s) of the Act cannot be read to mean that it can only be that household which is household of the joint family of which husband is a member or in which husband of the aggrieved person has a share.In S.R. Batra vs Taruna Batra , the Supreme Court bench of Justices SB Sinha and M.Katju had rejected the contention that the definition of shared household includes a household where the person aggrieved lives or at any stage had lived in a domestic relationship. It held that the wife is only entitled to claim a right to residence in a shared household, and a `shared household’ would only mean the house belonging to or taken on rent by the husband, or the house which belongs to the joint family of which the husband is a member. The court had further observed that claim for alternative accommodation can only be made against the husband and not against the husband’s in-laws or other relatives.Background In this case, Satish Chander Ahuja filed a Suit against his daughter in law [ the sole-defendant ] for mandatory and permanent injunction and also for recovery of damages/mesne profit. In the plaint, he pleaded that defendant has filed a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in which interim order directing the plaintiff not to alienate and not to dispossess the defendant without order of the competent court has been passed. He further pleaded that the status of occupation of defendant as a daughter-in-law during subsistence of marriage with the son could be said to be permissive in nature and defendant is not entitled to claim a right of residence against the plaintiff, i.e., her father-in-law who has no obligation to maintain her during the lifetime of her husband. In the written statement, the daughter in law claimed that the suit property is a shared household as per provision of Section 2(s) of the Act, 2005, and thus she has right to stay/reside in the shared household. The trial court decreed the suit filed by Ahuja by allowing his application filed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC., taking note of the admission made by the defendant in her pleadings filed in the domestic violence case that the plaintiff to be the owner of the suit property. The High Court, while setting aside the Trial Court judgment, observed that question the suit could not have been simply decreed by the Trial Court on the basis of the title without weighing the effect of the statutory right in favour of the the daughter in law. The High Court, remanded the case back to Trial Court by issuing some directions.In this appeal before the Supreme Court against the High Court order, the plaintiff placed reliance on Batra judgment to contend that the premises is not a shared household since the husband neither has any share in the suit premises nor suit premises is a joint family property. The issues considered by the bench included the following [The consideration of other issues in this appeal and factual background have been dealt with in another report].:(1) Whether definition of shared household under Section 2(s) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 has to be read to mean that shared household can only be that household which is household of joint family or in which husband of the aggrieved person has a share? (2) Whether judgment in S.R. Batra and Anr. Vs. Taruna Batra, (2007) 3 SCC 169 has not correctly interpreted the provision of Section 2(s) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and does not lay down a correct law? Referring to the words “lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship”, the bench said that it has to be given its normal and purposeful meaning. The court also, referring to precedents, observed that the use of both the expressions “means and includes” in Section 2(s) clearly indicate the legislative intent that the definition is exhaustive and shall cover only those which fall within the purview of definition and no other. The bench observed:From the above definition, following is clear:- (i) it is not requirement of law that aggrieved person may either own the premises jointly or singly or by tenanting it jointly or singly; (ii) the household may belong to a joint family of which the respondent is a member irrespective of whether the respondent or the aggrieved person has any right, title or interest in 53 the shared household; and (iii) the shared household may either be owned or tenanted by the respondent singly or jointly.”The living of woman in a household has to refer to a living which has some permanency. Mere fleeting or casual living at different places shall not make a shared household. The intention of the parties and the nature of living including the nature of household have to be looked into to find out as to whether the parties intended to treat the premises as shared household or not. As noted above, Act 2005 was enacted to give a higher right in favour of woman. The Act, 2005 has been enacted to provide for more effective protection of the rights of the woman who are victims of violence of any kind occurring within the family. The Act has to be interpreted in a manner to effectuate the very purpose and object of the Act. Section 2(s) read with Sections 17 and 19 of Act, 2005 grants an entitlement in favour of the woman of the right of residence under the shared household irrespective of her having any legal interest in the same or not.”The court also observed that use of the expression “at any stage has lived” to protect the women from denying the benefit of right to live in a shared household on the ground that on the date when application is filed, she was excluded from possession of the house or temporarily absent. The court said that the object was not that wherever the aggrieved person has lived with the relatives of husband, all such houses shall become shared household, which is not the legislative intent. Disagreeing with the Batra judgment observations, the bench said that apprehensions expressed by the bench were not true. The court said:The shared household is contemplated to be the household, which is a dwelling place of aggrieved person in present time. When we look into the different kinds of orders or reliefs, which can be granted on an application filed by aggrieved person, all orders contemplate providing protection to the women in reference to the premises in which aggrieved person is or was in possession. Our above conclusion is further fortified by statutory scheme as delineated by Section 19 of the Act, 2005. In event, the definition of shared household as occurring in Section 2(s) is read to mean that all houses where the 60 aggrieved person has lived in a domestic relationship alongwith the relatives of the husband shall become shared household, there will be number of shared household, which was never contemplated by the legislative scheme. The entire Scheme of the Act is to provide immediate relief to the aggrieved person with respect to the shared household where the aggrieved person lives or has lived. As observed above, the use of the expression “at any stage has lived” was only with intent of not denying the protection to aggrieved person merely on the ground that aggrieved person is not living as on the date of the application or as on the date when Magistrate concerned passes an order under Section 19. The apprehension expressed by this Court in paragraph 26 in S.R. Batra Vs. Taruna Batra (supra), thus, was not true apprehension and it is correct that in event such interpretation is accepted, it will lead to chaos and that was never the legislative intent. We, thus, are of the considered opinion that shared household referred to in Section 61 2(s) is the shared household of aggrieved person where she was living at the time when application was filed or in the recent past had been excluded from the use or she is temporarily absent.The observation of this Court in S.R. Batra Vs. Taruna Batra (supra) that definition of shared household in Section 2(s) is not very happily worded and it has to be interpreted, which is sensible and does not lead to chaos in the society also does not commend us. The definition of shared household is clear and exhaustive definition as observed by us. The object and purpose of the Act was to grant a right to aggrieved person, a woman of residence in shared household. The interpretation which is put by this Court in S.R. Batra Vs. Taruna Batra (supra) if 64 accepted shall clearly frustrate the object and purpose of the Act. We, thus, are of the opinion that the interpretation of definition of shared household as put by this Court in S.R. Batra Vs. Taruna Batra (supra) is not correct interpretation and the said judgment does not lay down the correct law.Domestic violence in this country is rampant The court observed that the right of occupation of matrimonial home, was not so far part of the statutory law in India until the Domestic Violence Act of 2005 was enacted. It said:The progress of any society depends on its ability to protect and promote the rights of its women. Guaranteeing equal rights and privileges to women by the Constitution of India had marked the step towards the transformation of the status of the women in this country. The domestic violence in this country is rampant and several women encounter violence in some form or the other or almost every day, however, it is the least reported form of cruel behavior. A woman resigns her fate to the never ending cycle of enduring violence and discrimination as a daughter, a sister, a wife, a mother, a partner or a single woman in her lifetime. This non-retaliation by women coupled with the absence of laws addressing women’s issues, ignorance of the existing laws enacted for women and societal attitude makes the women vulnerable. The reason why most cases of domestic violence are never reported is due to the social stigma of the society and the attitude of the women themselves, where women are expected to be subservient, not just to their male counterparts but also to the male’s relativesRights Under DV Act Can Be Claimed In Civil CourtsIn facts of the case, the court held that the claim of the defendant that suit property is shared household and she has right to reside in the house ought to have been considered by the Trial Court and non-consideration of the claim/defence is nothing but defeating the right, which is protected by Act, 2005. It said:”As per Section 26, any relief available under Sections 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Act, 2005 may also be sought in any legal proceeding, before a civil court, family court or a criminal court being the aggrieved person. Thus, the defendant is entitled to claim relief under Section 19 in suit, which has been filed by the plaintiff. Section 26 empowers the aggrieved person to claim above relief in Civil Courts also.”Case: SATISH CHANDER AHUJA vs. SNEHA AHUJA [CIVIL APPEAL NO.2483 of 2020 ] Coram: Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah Counsel: Adv Prabhjit Jauhar, Sr. Adv Nidhesh GuptaClick here to Read/Download JudgmentRead JudgmentNext Storylast_img